Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Age and ageing ; 50(Suppl 3), 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1601916

ABSTRACT

Background Quarantine, lockdowns and mandatory isolation have slowed the transmission of Covid-19. However, these public health measures have amplified frailty in our vulnerable older person population by increasing social disconnection, reducing exercise and access to early interventions. In response to this increasingly dependent older population we introduced a ‘frailty hub’ in our hospital. This hub allowed early access to a geriatric review as well as a broader multidisciplinary team intervention. Methods We performed a cross sectional review of our new hub which was introduced in our tertiary centre to priortise care of the older person.We analysed attendees from February to June 2021 (20 weeks of data). Results There were 121 new patient reviews and 127 follow up consultations.Commonly requested reason for referral was medical assessment (30%), cognitive assessments (30%) and falls(28%). Referral sources were analysed and included consultant referrals (11% n = 13), GP referrals (55% n = 67), multidisciplinary team referrals (6% n = 7) and emergency department referrals (26% n = 32). The average age of those review was 79 years (range 59 years to 99 years). Of all patients 65% were reviewed by physiotherapist, 45% were seen by an occupational therapist, 10% were seen by a speech and language therapist or dietician. 85% had a medication changes. 95% had a follow up review with either a geriatrician or advanced nurse practitioner. Conclusion Innovation is required to appropriately target our most vulnerable frail adults.The pandemic has had a detrimental effect on some older adult’s function.Our hub is targeting this group and optimising their care.These are our preliminary findings, we plan on doing further analysis.

2.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 38(29), 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1076208

ABSTRACT

Background: Provider experience and physician burnout has been recognized as a critical issue in medicine. Ontario, Canada has a single payer cancer system run by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) with a mandate covering system level planning and delivery of cancer services, funding, and quality improvement. As part of a larger provincial initiative to address clinician burnout, we examined the prevalence and drivers of burnout in practicing physician oncologists in Ontario. Methods: In November-December 2019, surgical, medical, hematological, and radiation oncologists in Ontario were invited to complete an anonymous online survey to assess burnout and its drivers. Burnout prevalence was assessed through the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS MP). Data on demographic, workplace, engagement, and practice profiles were collected. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to assess key variables associated with "high" burnout using a common definition of high scores on the MBI subscales of emotional exhaustion (EE) (> 27) and/or depersonalization (DP) (>10). Results: Response rate to the survey was 44% (n=418) with 72% reporting high levels of burnout. Mean scores for EE (30.7, SD 12.1) and DP (9.9, SD 6.7) were consistent with high burnout. Participants endorsed known drivers of burnout including: 1) a poor culture of wellness at work (e.g., not comfortable talking to leadership (72%), 2) inefficiencies of practice (e.g. feeling insufficient documentation time (67%)) and 3) personal resilience (e.g. not feeling they are contributing professionally in ways they value (21%)). Age (<45yrs) (OR: 2.15), poor/marginal control over workload (OR: 4.42), feeling used/unappreciated (OR: 2.63), working atmosphere that feels hectic/chaotic (OR: 2.68), and insufficient time for documentation requirements (OR: 2.52) significantly impacted the odds of high burnout in the regression model (p<0.05). Conclusions: The high rate of burnout among oncology physicians in a single payer public cancer system in Ontario is concerning for the wellbeing of providers, patients and system sustainability. Drivers important for maintaining a culture of wellness and efficiency of practice will require local, regional and provincial health policy to improve. Next steps will include raising awareness with provincial initiatives/policy to address key burnout drivers, and examining the impact of working under pandemic conditions (Covid-19) on oncologist burnout.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL